CONFERENCE UPDATE (ASCO 2025)

Savolitinib + osimertinib prolongs PFS in METamp, EGFR-mutated NSCLC post-first-line EGFR TKI failure: Results from the phase 3 SACHI trial

25 Sep 2025

STUDY DESIGN

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor gene amplification (METamp) has emerged as a key resistance mechanism in up to 22% of pretreated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).1 This alteration is associated with early disease progression and poor prognosis.1 Despite this, biomarker-guided treatment options following progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain limited.1 To date, there has been no randomized clinical trial specifically addressing METamp in this setting.1

Savolitinib, a selective MET inhibitor, and osimertinib, a third-generation (3G) EGFR-TKI, have previously demonstrated promising clinical activity against EGFR-mutated NSCLC with METamp in the TKI-refractory setting.1 The SACHI study is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial conducted in China to evaluate the efficacy and safety of savolitinib + osimertinib vs. platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC and METamp following first-line EGFR-TKI therapy failure.1

Eligible patients had unresectable or metastatic NSCLC with documented EGFR mutation and disease progression (PD) on first-line EGFR-TKI therapy.1 For those previously treated with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs, inclusion required being T790M-negative with METamp, whereas patients progressing on 3G EGFR-TKIs were required to have METamp alone.1 METamp was confirmed centrally by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH+).1 The METamp threshold was defined as MET gene copy number ≥5 or MET/CEP7 ratio ≥2 following first-/second-generation TKI or MET copy number ≥10 after 3G TKI exposure.1 All patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-1.1

A total of 211 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral savolitinib (600mg daily for ≥50kg or 400mg for <50kg) + osimertinib (80mg daily), or platinum + pemetrexed for 4-6 cycles followed by pemetrexed maintenance.1 Treatment continued until PD or unacceptable toxicity.1 Randomization was stratified by presence of brain metastases, prior 3G EGFR-TKI use and EGFR mutation subtype (exon 19 deletion, L858R, or other).1 Patients in the chemotherapy arm were allowed to cross over to receive savolitinib + osimertinib upon PD confirmed by an independent review committee (IRC).1 Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were balanced across treatment arms.1

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by investigators.1 The secondary endpoints presented were PFS by IRC, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.1

FINDINGS

 Primary endpoint :
  • The primary endpoint was PFS as assessed by investigators1
  • In the ITT population, the median PFS was 8.2 months vs. 4.5 months (HR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.23-0.49; p<0.0001), corresponding to a 66% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death1
  • The PFS benefit with savolitinib + osimertinib remained consistent across key subgroups, including those with prior 3G EGFR-TKI treatment (6.9 months vs. 3.0 months; HR=0.32; 95% CI: 0.18-0.57, p<0.0001) and those with or without brain metastasis1
  • In patients previously treated with first- or second- generation EGFR-TKI, median PFS in the savolitinib + osimertinib arm was 9.8 months vs. 5.4 months in the chemotherapy arm (HR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.56; p<0.0001)1
 Secondary endpoints :
  • The secondary endpoints included were PFS by IRC assessment, ORR, DoR, DCR, OS, and safety1
  • PFS by IRC assessment was consistent with investigator results, where in the 3G EGFR-TKI treatment-naïve population, those treated with savolitinib + osimertinib had a median PFS of 9.8 months vs. 5.4 months in those treated with chemotherapy (HR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.56; p<0.0001)1
  • Investigator-assessed ORR was 58% with the savolitinib + osimertinib arm vs. 34% with chemotherapy (stratified OR=2.74; 95% CI: 1.50-4.98; p=0.0004)1
  • Median DoR was 8.4 months vs. 3.2 months, favoring the savolitinib + osimertinib arm1
  • DCR was also notably higher in the savolitinib + osimertinib arm, reaching 89% compared to 67% with chemotherapy (OR=3.98; 95% CI: 1.81-8.82; p=0.0001)1
  • OS data were not mature at the time of analysis and formal results were not reported1
 Safety :
  • Savolitinib + osimertinib was generally well tolerated with no new safety signals nor unexpected toxicities1
  • Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 57% of patients in both treatment arms1
  • Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were slightly lower in the savolitinib + osimertinib arm (45% vs. 48%), and fewer patients discontinued treatment due to TRAE (6% vs. 8%) compared to the chemotherapy arm1
  • The savolitinib + osimertinib arm experienced lower rates of hematologic adverse events compared to the chemotherapy arm1

 

Get access to our exclusive articles.
Related Articles

The potential new first-line mNSCLC treatment regardless of PD-L1: Durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy improved survival

Over the past decades, treatment options in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without oncogenic drivers have been limited to cytotoxic chemotherapies with poor survival outcomes.1 Although patients’ overall survival (OS) has been prolonged with the current standard of care (SoC) (i.e. pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy) in recent years, the clinical outcomes are still suboptimal.2,3 Dual immunotherapy, which brought substantial survival improvements across multiple malignancies such as advanced melanoma, sheds light on the further advance of metastatic NSCLC (without driver mutations) management.4 The combination of nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI) with or without chemotherapy has demonstrated superior survival benefits in these patients, leading to the regulatory approval from the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA).5,6 More recently, the efficacy of durvalumab and tremelimumab plus chemotherapy (D + T + CT) in treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC patients has also been evaluated in the POSEIDON trial.7 In a webinar organized by the Hong Kong Precision Oncology Society, Dr. Melissa L. Johnson presented the encouraging data from POSEIDON and discussed the latest advances of immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. Dr. Au, Siu-Kie Joseph also shared his expert insights on the new POSEIDON data and discussed their impacts on the local clinical practice in an interview with Omnihealth Practice.