CONFERENCE UPDATE: ESGO 2024

Final analysis of NORA demonstrates the OS benefits of niraparib maintenance in Chinese PSROC patients regardless of gBRCAm status

STUDY DESIGN

Niraparib is a potent and highly selective poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor.1 PARP inhibitors have shown a trend of favorable overall survival (OS) in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) in the maintenance setting.1 However, this OS benefit appears inconsistent in patients without BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) mutations which has been attributed to confounding factors, such as post-progression therapies.1

The Niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer using an individualized starting dose (NORA) trial is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 study conducted in the Chinese population.1 The trial assessed niraparib as a maintenance therapy in PSROC using an individualized starting dose (ISD).1 Participants had high-grade serous, high-grade predominantly serous histology or germline BRCA mutations (gBRCAm) and had completed ≥2 previous lines of platinum-containing therapy with a partial or complete response.1 They were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib or a matching placebo and were dosed according to an ISD.1 Patients received a 300mg QD dose unless they had a body weight of <77kg and/or a platelet count of <150,000/μL, in which case 200mg QD was used instead.1

The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR).1 Secondary outcomes included OS results as well as the chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), the time to first subsequent treatment (TFST), as well as safety outcomes.1 At the primary analysis, niraparib has shown significant improvement over placebo in terms of PFS regardless of gBRCAm status.1 Another interim analysis revealed OS benefits across gBRCAm status with the use of ISD.1 In the captioned analysis, the results of the final OS analysis from NORA have been presented.1 Additionally, the safety analysis in terms of incidences of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other second primary malignancies were also summarized.1

OS:
  • OS in the intention to treat (ITT) population, and in subgroups by gBRCAm status were presented in this analysis1
  • In the ITT population, the median OS of the niraparib and the placebo groups were 51.5 months (95% CI: 41.4-58.9) and 47.6 months (95% CI: 33.3-NE) respectively (HR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.60-1.23)1
  • In the gBRCAm population, the median OS of the niraparib and the placebo groups were 56.0 months (95% CI: 36.1-NE) and 47.6 months (95% CI: 31.6-NE) respectively (HR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.46-1.58)1
  • In the non-gBRCAm population, the median OS of the niraparib and the placebo groups were 46.5 months (95% CI: 41.0-NE) and 46.9 months (95% CI: 31.8-NE) respectively (HR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.56-1.35)1
  • 46.6% of participants in the placebo arm received at least one dose of subsequent PARP inhibitor therapy1
Safety:
  • After long-term follow-up, no new safety signals were identified1
  • No MDS/AML was reported in the placebo arm compared with 1.7% (n=3) in the niraparib arm1
  • Second primary malignancies other than MDS/AML which included rectal cancer, gastric cancer, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, and ductal carcinoma in situ of left breast occurred in 1.7% of the niraparib arm and 3.4% of the placebo arm respectively1

 

“The phase 3 NORA trial continues to support the use of niraparib maintenance therapy with ISD for patients with PSROC, regardless of gBRCAm status.”

Dr. Wu Xiaohua
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

Get access to our exclusive articles.
Related Articles