CONFERENCE UPDATE

Long-term clopidogrel monotherapy superior to aspirin in high ischemic risk patients post-PCI: Results from the SMART-CHOICE 3 trial

26 Jul 2025

STUDY DESIGN 

Indefinite aspirin monotherapy has long been the standard after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients, but its benefits remain debated.1 Emerging but limited evidence suggests that clopidogrel may be a superior alternative, highlighting the need for large-scale trials focused on high-risk populations to establish definitive guidance.1 The SMART-CHOICE 3 trial was an investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, multicenter study conducted across 26 sites in South Korea to compare the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel vs. aspirin monotherapy beyond the standard duration of DAPT in post-PCI patients at high risk of recurrent ischemic events.1 

In the SMART-CHOICE 3 trial, a total of 5,506 patients (median age: 65 years) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either clopidogrel 75mg once daily (n=2,752) or aspirin 100mg once daily (n=2,754).1 Eligible participants were adults aged 19 years or older who had undergone successful PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) and had completed a standard duration of DAPT—defined as at least 12 months following myocardial infarction (MI) or at least 6 months after PCI for other indications.1 To qualify as high risk for recurrent ischemic events, patients were required to have at least one clinical characteristic, such as a history of MI, medication-treated diabetes mellitus, or complex coronary artery lesions.1 The median interval between PCI and randomization was 17.5 months, and the median follow-up duration was 2.3 years.1 Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were well-balanced between the two treatment groups.1 

The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, MI, or stroke, evaluated over the study follow-up period.1 Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint— MI and stroke—as well as death from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes, and bleeding events classified according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.1 A composite endpoint known as net adverse clinical events (NACE), comprising MACCE plus BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding, was also assessed to evaluate the overall clinical benefit and safety of each treatment strategy.

FINDINGS

Primary endpoint:
  • The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of MACCE, defined by a composite of all-cause death, MI, or stroke1
  • The cumulative incidence of MACCE at 3 years was 4.4% in the clopidogrel group and 6.6% in the aspirin group, showing a statistically significant 29% relative risk reduction with clopidogrel (HR=0.71; 95% CI: 0.54-0.93; p=0.013)1
Secondary endpoints:
  • Secondary endpoints included the cumulative incidences in the individual components of the primary endpoint— MI, stroke, and death from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes, and bleeding events1
  • MI occurred less frequently in the clopidogrel group (1.0%) compared to the aspirin group (2.2%), indicating a significant risk reduction of 46% at 3 years (HR=0.54; 95% CI: 0.33-0.90)1
  • Stroke incidence was similar between both groups, with an event rate of 1.3% in each group (HR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.46-1.36)1
  • The risk of cardiovascular death was 21% lower in the clopidogrel than the aspirin group (HR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.50-1.24)1
  • Overall bleeding events (BARC type 2, 3, or 5) occurred at the same cumulative incidence of 3.0% in both groups (HR=0.97; 95% CI: 0.67-1.42)1
  • Major bleeding (BARC type 3 or 5) occurred at comparable rates in both groups (HR=1.00; 95% CI: 0.58-1.73)1
Safety:
  • NACEs occurred less frequently in the clopidogrel group compared to the aspirin group (HR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.61-0.99)1

 

"The SMART-CHOICE 3 trial was the first to demonstrate the benefits of clopidogrel monotherapy compared with aspirin monotherapy on a composite of hard endpoints in patients at a high risk of recurrent ischemic events after PCI 

Dr. Joo-Yong Hahn 

Samsung Medical Centre, 

Seoul, Korea 

Get access to our exclusive articles.