CONFERENCE UPDATE: ESMO 2023

Pembrolizumab + CCRT offers survival benefits to patients with previously untreated locally advanced cervical cancer: The ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study

03 Jan 2024

STUDY DESIGN

Previous clinical trials have shown that pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, offered clinical benefits and a manageable safety profile to patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, either as a monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy CT.1 In the ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study, the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with previously untreated, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer were assessed.1

In this randomized, double-blinded, multicentre phase 3 study, 1,060 patients with either stage IB2-IIB (node-positive) or stage III-IVA (either node-positive or negative) cervical cancer were enrolled across 176 sites in 30 countries.1  Patients were randomized to receive a CCRT regimen [cisplatin 40mg/m2 QW + external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by brachytherapy] with either pembrolizumab 200mg (n=529) or placebo every 3 weeks (n=530) for 5 cycles. In addition, 15 cycles of pembrolizumab 400mg or placebo Q6W was offered as the maintenance therapy for their respective treatment groups.1

At a median follow-up of 17.9 months (range: 0.9-31.0), the primary endpoints progression-free survival (PFS) (per RECIST v1.1) by investigators or histopathologic confirmation and overall  survival (OS) were measured.1 Secondary endpoints which included 24-month PFS, overall  response rate (ORR), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and safety, were also measured.1

FINDINGS

Primary endpoints:
  • The primary endpoints were PFS and OS1
  • The pembrolizumab + CCRT cohort had a significantly improved PFS compared to placebo + CCRT, resulting in a 30% risk-reduction in disease progression or death (HR=0.70; 95% CI: 0.55-0.89; p=0.002)1
  • OS data were immature (42.9% maturity). This interim analysis found pembrolizumab + CCRT to have a favorable trend in OS when compared to placebo + CCRT (HR=0.73; 95% CI: 0.49-1.07), though statistical significance has not been reached1
Secondary endpoints:
  • The secondary endpoints were 24-month PFS, ORR, and PROs1
  • The 24-month PFS rate of pembrolizumab + CCRT cohort (67.8%; 95% CI: 61.8-73.0) was slightly higher compared to the placebo + CCRT cohort (57.3%; 95% CI: 51.2-62.9)1
  • A higher ORR was observed in the pembrolizumab + CCRT cohort compared to the placebo + CCRT group (79.3% vs. 75.9%; difference=3.4%; 95% CI: -1.7-8.5%)1
  • At month 12, 81.4% of patients in the pembrolizumab + CCRT cohort exhibited ongoing response compared to 77.3% in the placebo + CCRT cohort1
  • No clinically meaningful between-group difference in changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores from baseline was observed at week 361
Safety:
  • Overall, the safety profile for pembrolizumab plus CCRT was manageable and consistent with previous studies1
  • The incidence of treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) was similar in both treatment groups (96.0%), with a slightly higher proportion of patients in the pembrolizumab +     CCRT cohort developing Grade ≥3 TRAEs (67.0 vs. 60.6%) and serious TRAEs (17.2% vs. 12.3%)1
  • Immune-mediated AEs were higher in the pembrolizumab arm than the placebo arm (32.6% vs. 11.7%), of which 4.2% were Grade ≥3 compared to 1.1% in the placebo group1
  • The most common immune-mediated AEs in both groups were hypothyroidism (pembrolizumab vs. placebo: 19.3% vs. 4.5%) and hyperthyroidism (pembrolizumab vs. placebo: 11.4% vs. 2.1%) but most were of Grade 1-21

 

"These data support pembrolizumab + CCRT as a new potential standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer"

Dr. Domenica Lorusso
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS/Catholic
University of Sacred Heart,
Rome, Italy

Get access to our exclusive articles.
Related Articles