CONFERENCE UPDATE: ESMO 2023

Clinically meaningful benefits with 2L or later line sacituzumab govitecan for patients with mTNBC in the real-world setting

29 Dec 2023

STUDY DESIGN

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) who have previously received ≥2 prior systemic therapies.1 Its remarkable efficacy had been compared to conventional chemotherapy (CTx) and demonstrated superiority over single-agent CTx in the ASCENT study, where it significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 60% and offered a 50% overall survival benefit when compared to CTx.1 To evaluate the clinical efficacy of SG in real-world settings, a retrospective, observational cohort study was commenced to investigate the real-world application of SG as a second-line (2L) or later (3L+) treatment for patients with mTNBC.1

A total of 230 patients who were diagnosed with mTNBC and prescribed SG as a 2L or 3L+ treatment were included in this real-world analysis and followed up from April 2020 to May 2022, cumulating a median follow-up of 7.2 months.1 Among the patient population, 33% of patients received SG as a 2L treatment.1 The treatment regimen of SG in this population consisted of a median of 9 doses with a starting dose of 10mg/kg that lasted for a median duration of 3.8 months.1 At the end of the study, 9% of patients continued their SG treatment.1

The key endpoints of this real-world analysis consisted of the real-world clinical outcomes of the study population, which included real-world overall survival (rwOS), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to next treatment or death (TTNTD), SG treatment discontinuation and modification rates, and incident adverse events (AEs).

Primary endpoints:
  • The primary endpoints included rwOS, rwPFS, TTNTD, SG treatment discontinuation and modification rates, and incident AEs1
  • The median rwOS of the study population (n=230) was 10.0 months (95% CI: 8.3-11.1 months), with a 12-month and 24-month OS rate of 40% and 23% respectively1
  • The rwOS benefits observed in the study population were consistent when patients were stratified by G-CSF usage (Yes: 9.1 months; No: 10.2 months) and treatment-free interval (<12 months: 11.1 months; ≥12 months: 10.9 months)1
  • The median rwPFS of the study population was 3.8 months (95% CI 3.1-4.3 months) while the median TTNTD of the study population was 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.9-5.3 months)1
  • Compared to patients who received SG as a 3L+ treatment (n=153), patients who received SG as a 2L treatment (n=77) had slightly longer rwOS (13.9 vs. 8.4 months), higher 12-month (51% vs. 35%) and 24-month (32 vs. 20%) OS rates1
  • Patients who received SG in the 2L also had a longer TTNTD (4.8 vs. 4.4 months) and rwFPS (4.9 vs. 3.9 months) compared with those who received it in later lines1
Safety:
  • Overall, the safety profile of SG in this analysis was consistent with the ASCENT study, with a toxicity-induced treatment discontinuation rate, dose reduction rate and dose interruption rate of 7%, 26% and 39% respectively1
  • The most prevalent AEs reported were fatigue (45%), neutropenia (33%) and diarrhea (30%)1

 

“The effectiveness and tolerability profile of sacituzumab govitecan in this broad and racially diverse real-world population with poorer prognostic factors was consistent with findings from the phase 3 ASCENT study.”

Dr. Kevin Kalinsky
Winship Cancer Institute,
Emory University,
Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Get access to our exclusive articles.
Related Articles

Real-world data confirm effectiveness of letermovir prophylaxis in reducing CMV manifestations in alloHCT recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication that surfaces in recipients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) and may lead to overall detrimental effects on the transplant outcome.1,2 Antiviral prophylaxis (where antivirals are given to all transplant recipients) or preemptive therapies (where antivirals are prescribed only if CMV is detected) are used to counter the risk of CMV infection in alloHCT recipients.3 The success of preemptive therapy depends on early detection, since the early reactivation of CMV in transplant recipients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.1,2 This leads to the consideration of antiviral prophylaxis, which can effectively prevent early CMV activation.1,2 The mainstay antiviral drugs like valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir are often associated with a high incidence of toxicity and adverse drug reactions in these patients, propelling the development of novel antivirals.1,2 Letermovir is a relatively novel antiviral drug that targets the deoxyribonucleic acid terminal transferase of CMV and inhibits its maturation.2,4 This medicine was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)  in 2017 as a prophylactic treatment for alloHCT CMV-seropositive recipients, based on the efficacy results of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial.1,2 Letermovir is safe and efficacious with a favorable tolerability profile, but its clinical performance should be persistently monitored in the real-world setting.1,2,5 In the 48th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) held in March 2022, Raval et al. presented the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the real-world observational studies on the impact of letermovir as primary prophylaxis in adult alloHCT recipients in a clinical setting.6